Krisis sa Bigas: Bayoteknolohiya ang Lulutas?

November 1st, 2008 by vj-stephanie

Krisis sa Bigas: Bayoteknolohiya ang Lulutas?

Sa loob ng 20 taon ay sinasabing dumaranas ang bansa ng kakulangan sa bigas[1]. Ang naturang malalang kakulangan ay maituturing nating krisis. Dahil dito, patuloy ang paghahanap ng solusyon ng iba’t ibang sektor ng lipunan, kabilang na rito ang syensya. Sa papel na ito, aming tatalakayin ang isang makabagong pamamaraang hatid nito – ang bayoteknolohiya. Dahil ang partikular na pinatutungkulan ng papel na ito ay krisis sa bigas, ang diskusyon ay lilimitahan lamang sa aplikasyon ng bayoteknolohiya sa mga pananim (Plant Biotechnology).

Ang Plant Biotechnology ay ang paggamit ng mga buhay na organismo o substance upang mapaunlad ang kalidad ng isang pananim. Kabahagi ng pamamaraang ito ang paggamit ng teknik na tinatawag na genetic engineering na kung saan ang genetic make-up ng isang halaman (halimbawa: bigas) ay binabago upang magtaglay ito ng mas kapaki-pakinabang na katangian.

Batay sa mga pagsusuri, maraming magaganda at mabubuting dulot ang paggamit at pagkonsumo ng GM Rice. Kabilang na dito ang pagpapaunlad ng ani dahil na rin sa pagkakaroon ng mataas na kalidad at pagtataglay ng karagdagang sustansya. Napapababa rin nito ang gastos sa produksyon at nababawasan ang pagkasira ng lupa. Makakatulong ito hindi lamang sa mga konsumer, kundi pati na rin sa mga nagsasaka.

Ngunit sa kabila ng mga pangakong ito ng GM Rice, may mga tumututol pa rin sa paggamit nito. Partikular na sa kanilang argumento ang pangamba sa masamang dulot nito sa kalusugan at kalikasan. Hingil sa una, sinasabing ang GM Rice ay maaaring magdulot ng allergies at antibiotic immunity. At sa kabilang dako, inaalala rin ng nasabing mga sektor ang kapakanan ng iba pang miyembro ng kalikasan tulad ng mga insekto at iba pang halaman na hindi intensyong maapektuhan.

Batay sa mga impormasyong nauna nang nailahad at sa paggamit ng Cost Benefit Analysis na kung saan tinitimbang ang halaga ng kawalan kumpara sa benepisyong makukuha, ang pangkat na ito ay naninindigan na ang mga agam-agam at pagdududang nabanggit ay hindi sapat upang hadlangan ang pagtangkilik sa GM Rice. Ito ay alinsunod din sa Prinsipyo ng Yutilitaryanismo. Narito ang punto-por-puntong kasagutan sa mga pagtutol sa paggamit ng naturang produkto. Una, ukol sa isyu ng kalusugan, pinatotohanan ng UK Department of Health’s Advisory Committee on Novel Foods & Processes na bagamat may batayan ang kanilang agam-agam, ang posibilidad na mangyari ito ay ga-dwende lamang. Ikalawa, para sa isyu ng kalikasan, pinapagtibay ng derivative ng Natural Moral Law na nararapat lamang na bigyang halaga at panatilihin ang sariling buhay. Kung pagbabatayan ito, malinaw na maaaring unahin ang sariling kapakanan, higit sa iba pang miyembro ng kalikasan.

Sa huli, mahihinuha na isang epektibong solusyon sa krisis sa bigas ang paggamit ng GM (Genetically Modified) rice.


[1] Cariño, Conrad. The Sunday Times. April 26, 2008.

Wanted: Method for Learning New Language

October 27th, 2008 by vj-stephanie

Learning a new language is a nice experience. Some take it as part of their hobbies while others do it out of necessity. In fact, I am also interested in acquiring a new mode of communication. I find it fascinating to speak and write using other languages aside from Filipino or English. I personally think that being a multilingual is special. I’m not that certain if it’s a form of talent or skill, but what I know is having different languages for communication is an advantage.

This topic is one of the interesting parts of psychology of language that I am eager to understand. It’s just that there are a lot of plausible facts that I can use and relate to my experiences. Well, I am also lucky to have a close friend who is definitely multilingual. Just like most of us, she is fluent with English and Filipino. Aside from those, she also knows Zambal as her dialect. And not only that, as a European Language major here in our university, she is taking Italian as her major and French as her minor. Isn’t it amazing? It appears that she’s inlove with languages. In fact, in one of my sincerest conversation with her, she utters that learning and understanding languages (particularly our languages and European Languages) is her passion. That’s why from the moment I read this assignment, I know the perfect person for the interview.

I choose the method of classroom learning. My interviewee actually agrees and proves that based on her experience, this method is commonly used. The professor plays an important role here. Their teachers are often non-native speakers who are fluent enough with the language. In fact, my interviewee claims that their professor appears as a talking dictionary who translates the words or phrases that are unfamiliar to them. She clarifies two sets of learning or training that they experienced: basic and advance learning. In terms of the basic learning that occurs at the early phase of the beginners, the professor is the one who translates what he utters. On the other hand, when the students are at the latter part and they seem to be adjusted with the new language, they enter in the stage of advance learning. The students themselves are interpreting what their teachers are saying to them. This enables the learner, as well as the teacher, to test the lexicon and understanding of the language.

In addition to these information, I also ask her the phase of discussion. She summarizes it by saying that it starts with the basics of grammar, syntax and the development of uttering the right sounds. Then once these things were satisfied, they eventually conduct dialogue before the class starts.

I realize that this classroom learning can also be accompanied by another method like using language tapes. My interviewee explains that they often listen to a CD about two or more people talking to each other in the target language. It is also the reason why their professors have a CD player for the class. According to her, the speakers in the CD are often native Italian or French conducting the right accent. And after listening to the conversation, the professor would ask them about it.

When I ask her why she chooses to learn languages, she admits that, aside from the fact that she loves doing it, it is primarily because of her course. Second, she thinks of globalization. She recognizes the need to communicate with other people and the intercultural understanding that it requires once she reaches Europe. Moreover, she exclaims that it is also a part of her dream job.

I believe that it is also essential to analyze this matter in a deeper understanding. It would be better to apply some of the concepts comprising the three principal dimensions that characterize language-teaching method. In terms of the first dimension, which is Language Focus: Speech Communication vs. Literature, the method like the classroom learning often uses the target language as the teaching language. It emphasizes direct contact with the language. Upon hearing the words, the student can facilitate the intonations, stress and others.

Concerning the second dimension that is Meaning Learning: Direct Experience vs. Translation, the professor in the classroom can use the native language (English or Filipino) to express the meaning of the target language (Italian or French). For example, the professor can use the phrase “You’re beautiful!” to translate the Italian phrase “Sei bellissima!”[1].  It sounds like the Grammar-Translation Method. On the other hand, direct experience can also help an individual especially the beginners, by exposing him to the actual object. A professor can point to a red flower to teach the French phrase “la rouge fleur”.

And to the third dimension, which is Grammar Learning: Induction vs. Explication, it is proven based on my interview that class learning comprises both. Sometimes it starts first with the explication for the explanation; it’s like the basic learning that we discussed earlier. And once the students are in the advanced stage, they can learn by induction. I remember here the natural method wherein students undergo self-analysis. After experiencing the speech of the professor, they analyze it and then learn the grammatical rules and structures. In some foreign language teaching, there is spontaneous conversation accompanied with some sort of gestures as a form of demonstration.

Many methods take place in classroom learning. As I analyze this method and the statements of my interviewee, I can say that it’s much like the Total Physical Response that also emphasizes target language in the classroom and meaning is derived from actual objects and situations. It is good that professors encourage their students to speak. There are also activities that enhance the motor and intellectual skills of the individual. Natural approach teaching like oral drills provides a venue for practice of speech production and grammar. It engages the individual to simple conversational exchange or dialogues, reading newspaper and writing letters. In some instances, it appears in the form of Task-based language teaching through solving a puzzle, reading a map and others. 

On the other hand, there are also some circumstances wherein the method is not successful. In my experience, one problem lies in the number of the students. Sometimes a larger number tends to threaten the learning. The professor cannot accommodate every student. He cannot focus one-on-one with his students. But then, I remember that he manages us by getting us to speak in chorus. Another flaw that my interviewee emphasized is in terms of translating. Sometimes inspite of the effort of the professor to translate words, the students cannot understand it. It is because some of the words in foreign language cannot be presented directly with an object. For example, the professor finds it hard to explain the French word “niege” (which means “snow”) to someone who did not know or had not seen a snow.

Inspite of those nuisances that can be experienced with the method, we can still claim that this classroom method is successful. My interviewee even says that the method helped her a lot. She finds it awesome to learn new languages by interacting with other people. Having those activities that would facilitate learning makes the classroom experience as an exciting scheme. I can personally say that in evaluating the methods we have, this classroom learning is a reliable one, considering the goals I have in mind. It is also good that sometimes we avoid over-reliance to dictionary; instead, we let the contexts help us.

[1] All the translations are made possible with the help of my interviewee.

YES for animal rights

August 10th, 2008 by vj-stephanie

Animals As Pets & As Living Creature

If you were given a chance to be an animal, what kind of animal would you choose? What pet do you want to have as a gift?

How much is that doggie in the window? (arf! arf!)
The one with the waggly tail
How much is that doggie in the window? (arf! arf!)
I do hope that doggie’s for sale.

I must take a trip to California
And leave my poor sweetheart alone
If he has a dog, he won’t be lonesome
And the doggie will have a good home.

How much is that doggie in the window? (arf! arf!)
The one with the waggly tail
How much is that doggie in the window? (arf! arf!)
I do hope that doggie’s for sale.

I read in the papers there are robbers
With flashlights that shine in the dark
My love needs a doggie to protect him
And scare them away with one bark.

The song above entitled Doggie in the Window typically talks of someone who wants to have a pet. It shows how an animal affects and influences humans. Many of us now a days are aware of the importance of animals in our environment. We can actually feel their presence in all the things that we do. In this paper, I would discuss different views regarding animals as pet and as a member of biotic community. I will use the principles I’ve learned to explain lucidly the condition of our animals today.

A pet is commonly referred as a companion animal that we usually stayed and played with at home. These wonderful creatures provide many benefits to humans, like comforting us and helping us to relieve stress. There are even times that the owner and his pet forms friendship. According to US Government National Institute of Health, the most popular pets are noted for their loyal or playful characteristics, for their attractive appearance, or for their song. Actually, we’ll notice that most pets serve no utilitarian purpose, but are kept because they evoke affection or curiosity, and often are given a special status as companions for members of the family.

Given this kind of relationship between them, can we say that humans have obligations towards non-humans? Are we permissible to have them as pets in the first place? Well, if we are about to use the perspective of Kant, we are allowable to have pets. Our duties towards them are considered to be merely indirect duties towards humanity. We can use them as a means in realizing our ends as rational beings. In some instances, a pet may help people achieve their health goals. Through respecting them and fulfilling our indirect duty, we come to appreciate the condition of others. We enable to learn how to care for other creatures and we eventually exercise our moral values.

On the other hand, there are times that we have placed many organisms in danger of extinction in our efforts to meet our needs. Often this is a result of not knowing we were doing it. As time passed by, I can see that animals become a commodity. Generally, I would say that every family has a pet of their own. Dogs, fishes, birds and cats are the most common pets that we can find. But I notice that there are people who loved wild species as their companion like snakes, spiders and others. They are captivated by the unique beauty and allure of wild and exotic animals, and some are tempted to take their admiration to the next level and acquire a wild or exotic pet. Actually, rich people even consider the breed that they choose and it appears to be some sort of their collection. It then leads to intentional trapping and hunting for a cost. The animals here are viewed merely as resources. I remember the idea of Peter Singer accentuating that we should not use animals for trivial purposes. It is also connected with the view concerning the satisfaction of interest. In the exploitation of the wildlife, it focuses merely on the satisfaction of the exploiter. Jeremy Bentham would claim that it is unjust, because it is ought to be a maximization of interests for all. In having wild animals as pets, we still have to consider sentience or their capacity to have conscious experiences. In some cases, a mismatch between a pet and owner results in the neglect or abandonment of the pet. At some point, we deny their freedom and neglect the fact that they also feel pain. We think that they are not capable of it because they are irrational beings. But this mode of judgment is quite anthropocentric. I had a pet for a long time. Even though he doesn’t have the ability to talk to me, I can somehow sense what he feels. I don’t know how but I honestly feel our attachment. When I’m sad, I can feel that he sympathized with me. Language might be important but for some circumstances, connection is enough to show what you feel. I can’t deny that my dog has the capacity to experience pain. External evidence like behaviour proves it. I believe that it is not the question of how much pain. Pain is pain no matter where it inflicts. Although some might say that it is just a state of mind, still it affects a lot to someone, even to an animal, who is hurt.

Many concerned people do not recommend those wild and tame animals as pets. It is important that we consider the danger of having them at home. Caring for them is difficult and at some point, impossible. They often grow to be larger, stronger, and more dangerous than owners expect or can manage. It then tends to be harmful to human’s life. With regards to this case, we have to emphasize the life of a human being. It is the preference of human over the animal; it’s not a matter of being biased with our species. But the preference is based on the characteristics that we have and not merely on the fact of being a member of the Homo sapiens species.

If we are faced with the dilemma between a life of man & non-human (particularly our pet), we often feels to be in the middle position wherein inspite of choosing human over the others, we still bring nonhuman animals within our sphere of moral concern. I think it shows that equality is not about equal or identical treatment but rather, it refers to equal consideration. It is essential that we consider humans and animals having equal intrinsic value on their right to life and concerns. We are all subjects of life aiming for our individual welfare.

In having pets, we are not taking dominion over those animals; instead we are denying our superiority. The Genesis Christian-Hebrew view can also emphasized my point. We have to note that we are the caretaker of the Earth. God gave us the ability to name the creatures and the dominion over them. But this doesn’t mean that we can just take them for granted. Just like what Lynn White said, it is about stewardship and not merely about dominance. We have to understand the virtue of humility for all God’s creatures. And as a pet owner, we have the responsibilities to fulfil.

In addition to it, realizing our symbolic relationship with nature is important rather than thinking that we are conquerors of this land. We are all members of a community of interdependent parts as it is emphasized in the land ethics of Aldo Leopold. That’s why we have obligation to this land comprising the soil, water, plants and animals here on our planet. I believe that we have to consider the notion of conservation. It might be a slow pace for improvement of our environment but it is an effective way of protecting every living creatures. In terms of having a pet, we have to be aware of the possibilities that it entails. We must consider the sustainable development of the species of animal that we chose as pets. Through it, we enhance the harmony between men and environment. We uphold our effort to understand and preserve our nature. I like Callicott’s idea of enhancing the diversity, integrity, stability and beauty of the biotic community through respecting all the creatures. The life-centered system of environmental ethics emphasizes that we have moral primer facie moral obligations to wild animals. We have to recognize that they are also members of the Earth’s biotic community. This means that they have intrinsic value within them that needs to be protected and promoted. It is essential in recognizing the biocentric outlook that individual organisms are teleological centers of life.

In my discussion here, I believe that some rules of duty can help a lot in elaborating the issue. One of those is the rule of non-interference. It required us to respect animals with their wild freedom by letting them alone. It does not permit us of having pets. It is because in doing so; we interfere in the natural life of the animals. There are human inclinations, or any form of human interests that need to be set aside. We must let them fulfil their destiny on their own. Humans cannot substitute for the need of any wild creatures. It is virtually impossible for a wild animal to adapt to traditional household living. It is also impossible for pet owners to influence behaviour patterns of wild animals or to predict when wild and often destructive behaviour will occur. It goes the same with the rule of fidelity. In having a pet, we might often break the trust shared by the animal and the owner. It is because when wild-caught animals are kept as pets, their suffering may begin with capture like the millions of birds and reptiles that suffer and die on the journey to the pet store every year. The rule implies that we should not deceive or mislead any animal capable of being deceived or mislead. We must be true to our intentions. It means that we should stop hunting, trapping and other form of it that would inflict harm leading to extinction.

As I reflect on the conditions of animals in our today, I find myself stucked with heartbreaking facts. Humans are not the only ones who experience injustice. Based on my observation on our environment, we can’t deny that animals, even our pets, also experience the same way.  Some critics pronounce shameful truth that we, rational beings, are the suspect in their sufferings. Even if we argue that it’s for the benefit and development of living, we end up with the fact that we use animals for our own sake.  I believe that if only the animals are given with the capacity to speak for themselves, for sure, their words would be as sharp as our words against our enemies. As an individual who is a part of this human race, it is painful that people appears to be an enemy and exploiter of these wonderful animals.

But do we have to wait for the time that might be too late for change? What if organisms suddenly disappear? They become extinct. Some might consider this as a natural process. But there are evidences that show that humans also played a role in that extinction. The forests were cut for lumber and cleared for farms. They were also hunted for foods. And we can’t deny that this has happened to many species of organisms throughout the history of humans.

From the peaks of its mountains to the depths of its oceans, Earth is the perfect place for life. We have the ability, though, to learn better ways to share Earth’s resources with other creatures. We have to keep in mind that, those animals are moral patients. I believe that having any animal as a pet means being responsible for providing appropriate and humane care. In environmental ethics, it showed that what happened to our environment is also happening to us.

I believe that it would be better if we stop being anthropocentric. We are neither the most important nor the dominant species that should govern the planet. I believe that looking through the holistic view would enable us to understand our relationship with other creatures here on Earth. We, as rational beings, must also learn to appreciate the ecosystem we are part of and we must also grasp the real meaning of life. It is nice to take everything into consideration. We have to recognize the inherent value of all lifeforms and play our part as a member of community. In the end, we must subdue the restitutive justice as a call of restoring the balance of nature. Love ourselves. Love our pets. Love our planet.

CWTS-stephanie magsumbol

July 6th, 2007 by vj-stephanie

PERSONAL DESCRIPTION

Stephanie Ellaine B. Magsumbol

2006-01837

B.A. Philosophy

CWTS1 - WCDE

FAVORITE THINGS

Picture1

TAZMANIA

Picture2 i-POD

Picture3 i LOvE CoLOr BLUE

Picture5 I aLways dream of visiting France

Picture6 it’s essential now a days

Picture7 i love grey’s anatomy

Picture8 i love these kinds of pocketbooks.

HATE PAGE

Picture9

reptiles

Picture10 messy places

Picture11 traffic

EXPECTATIONS IN CWTS

Im hoping that it would be very interesting.
Hopefully, it would molded me to be a better citizen.
Its not just about learning but also having fun in good terms, in such a way that we enjoy having interactions with other people.

EXPERIENCE IN COMMUNITY SERVICE

Girl Scout

KALIS (Kabataang Lingkod ng Simbahan) we assist during the mass

School donations every December

COMMUNITY SERVICE AND SERVICE LEARNING

           Community Service is an unpaid work for the welfare of the community. People involved or those volunteers help their neighborhoods and their society through social work, mentoring, charity works, environmental cleanup, and other citizens service.

           Service Learning is not just about giving service to other people. It also speaks of knowing or discovering something through those service experiences. We learn how to be sensitive in terms of interactions with our fellow members and citizens.

LECTURE 1: PHILIPPINE CULTURE

Culture is not that simple. Actually, its so complex that comprises the identity of an individual. Its about understanding why do people act as they are. Its not just a matter of describing people by basing it in our own culture or the so-called ethnocentricism. I believe that once we enter in a certain community, we already have effect in it. And its just up to us on what kind of effect we will impose in it.

We are cultural beings. We might think that our culture is a “naturalized” knowledge wherein we never even question it. But we must remember that we have our different cultural logics, meaning systems and value systems. We must be sensitive in terms of interactions with other people.

lECTURE 2: VOLUNTEERISM

We are cultural beings. We might think that our culture is a “naturalized” knowledge wherein we never even question it. But we must remember that we have our different cultural logics, meaning systems and value systems. We must be sensitive in terms of interactions with other people.

There are a lot of things to consider in service learning. Preparations and recommendations must also be considered. It is important that the activities can enhance the abilities of learning of the participants. Safety and notifications letters are also needed.

It might not be an easy task. But its goal can help us to be molded as a person imbued with intellectual integrity and involved in the social transformation of developing country.

LECTURE 3: NATIONALISM & CITIZENSHIP IN THE AGE OF GLOBALIZATION

There is a significant difference between the nation and state. Nation maybe an imagined community because you may not meet all the members of that community but there is a sense of belongingness. State has an external manifestation like the government, which plays an important role.

All of us have responsibilities in our country. And the ideal scenario there is to have a fruitful identity with our community. We can’t deny the fact that sometimes our national symbols fail to impart us our national belongingness. That’s why there is a great need for political participation. We need to empower our nation building.

Ethnic groups, globalizations and regional organizations are challenges to the nation-state. So as a responsible citizen, let’s take our part. We must do our civic responsibility and help in the improvement of our country.

LECTURE 4: WORK VALUES & CAREER ORIENTATION

There are social changes, which gives impact to the change of values of an individual. Some theories connected are Inglehart’s Generational Theory, Belief System, Marxist-related Belief and others. I relate a lot with leisure ethic. It’s because it’s not the work that you do. But you find pleasure in it. It is actually about having passion on it.

Actually, religion and marital status shouldn’t be associated with work values. What really matters is their attitudes and commitment to their work. Higher educational attainment often shows more work values.

Career is different from a job. It’s because job primarily pertains only to a set of activity but career has a certain direction which often goes upward.

Now a days, there are a lot of competencies. Modern career experiences are suddenly changing jobs and the stagnation in careers. Job seekers often satisfice themselves rather than optimize in their decision.

—VISITING VOLUNTEER ORGANIZATION—

EyeCare WeCare Foundation, Inc: bringing free vision services to indigents in the Philippines. We can’t deny that this is an interesting volunteer organization. Here, we think that we can learn where and how they are able to get the means to provide such services (for FREE!). Sadly, this organization’s office is nowhere in Manila; it is in Maao, Bago City, Negros Occidental! Yes, it’s far – way way way far. Cross this one out.
Museum Foundation of The Philippines, Inc: weave art and culture into your life. We don’t know exactly what this volunteer organization does for their website doesn’t say much. Just the same, we think it is still interesting (and probably fun too). Well, our group was not able to go here either. We all have different schedules and we just can’t find a common free time. Scratch this one too.
UP Haring Ibon: a youth crusader that continues to fight for the protection and conservation of our natural resources. Obviously, this is an environmental organization (a youth chapter of the HARIBON Foundation); but then again, it is not limited to such for UP Haring Ibon is also considered as a volunteer organization. Like the first two, we think it is also interesting; but unlike the EyeCare WeCare Foundation and the Museum Foundation of The Philippines, UP Haring Ibon is within our reach. It’s not just near every member’s place… It’s in UP Diliman! So off we went right after our CWTS class to their tambayan, College of Science Complex along the AS Walk. Friendly faces greeted us and we did just the same (Call this rapport.). We told them why we were there and asked if they can answer some of our questions (nature of their work, operations, volunteerism, etc.). And they said yes!
Mr. and Ms. Blog Reader, here is what we have gathered:
UP Haribon was established n 1987 in Narra Residence Hall. Environment protection is their main goal. They want to extent their projects from UP community to other places outside the university.
Some of their operations and accomplishments are:
• BOTE (Basics Of The Environment) – accomplished with a certain community wherein they organize seminars and practice recycling.
• Junk Art Contest During ACLE
• Bird Watching – concerns with analyzing the conditions of the birds and eventually identifies its different species. Actually, they start to compile what they have gathered. The book entitled Philippine Birds by John E. DuPont is a good example of it.
• Click sa Kalikasan – photography contests
• Expotrip – they examine the Dams.
• Tree planting in watersheds
• They also visit the zoo like Manila Zoo to study the conditions of the animals. Actually, they are anti-zoo.
• They also educate elementary students about the environment (2000).

For them, volunteerism is one of the best things a certain individual can do for his or her fellow citizens. They do it without asking anything in return. And when it comes to our country especially environment concerns, they are willing to help.

LECTURE 5: COMMUNITY PROFILING

We are all members of a community. We are interconnected with one another, which show that we have responsibilities or obligations to our fellow citizens. Whether we like or not, we are bonded as one and share similar issues and concerns.

Community profiles (area ecological, demographic & socio-economic, barangay and others) provides informations that enable us to manage the community in making decisions and providing other researches. It is used by community leaders, planners, students and other people involved.

It is important to identify first the kind of service the people really needs. It must be simple but applies maximum learning. It’s not that easy to profile a community. There are many things to consider. Sometimes even getting information regarding the key features, needs and resources of a place is also a problem. That’s why establishing a rapport is very important. We can try a focused conversation to know more about the subject.

What we need to do is to use first a data checklist. And them prepare a data collection plan. As a general rule, the more data the better. It is also advisable to use graphs and charts. We can generate unavailable data but observe fieldwork ethics.

Speaking of ethics, we really have to be sensitive in interacting with other people. Remember that we differ from one another. Our cultures vary and sometimes affect our way of living. Just like what I’ve said in the previous lectures, we affect the community once we enter on it. And we have the responsibility to lay positive effect on them.

THE FIVE PEOPLE YOU MEET IN HEAVEN by Mitch Albom

May 16th, 2007 by vj-stephanie

——How do people choose their final words? Do they realize their gravity? Are they fated to be wise?

When your time came, it came, and that was that. You might say something smart on your way out, but you might just as easily say something stupid.

——In the stories about life after death, the soul often floats above the good-bye moment, hovering over police cars at highway accidents, or clinging like a spider to hospital-room ceilings. These are people who receive a second chance, who somehow, for some reason, resume their place in the world.

—–People often belittle the place where they were born. But heaven can be found in the most unlikely corners. And heaven itself has many steps.

—–There are five people you meet in heaven. Each of us was in your life for a reason. You may not have known the reason at the time, and that is what heaven is for… For understanding your life on earth.

—–People think of heaven as a paradise garden, a place where they can float on clouds and laze in rivers and mountains. But scenery without solace is meaningless.

—–This is the greatest gift God can give you: to understand what happened in your life. To have it explained. It is the peace you have been searching for.

—–Why people gather when others die? Why people feel they should?

            It is because the human spirit knows, deep down, that all lives intersect. That death doesn’t just take someone, it misses someone else, and in the small distance between being taken and being missed, lives are changed.

—–No life is a waste. The only time we waste is the time we spend thinking we are alone.

—–Young men go to war. Sometimes because they have to, sometimes because they want to. Always, they feel they are supposed to. This comes from the sad, layered stories of life, which over the centuries have seen courage confused with picking up arms, and cowardice confused with laying them down.

——ich vermisse neunzehn!-

            Later that night, Eddie walks Marguerite along the promenade. He knows the names of every ticket taker and food vendor and they all wish him luck. Some of the older women get teary-eyed and Eddie figures they have sons of their own, already gone,

            He and Marguerite buy saltwater taffy, molasses and teaberry and root beer flavors. They pick out pieces from the small white bag, playfully fighting each other’s fingers. At the penny arcade, Eddie pulls on a plaster hand and the arrow goes past “clammy” and “harmless” and “mild”, all the way to “hot stuff”.

            “You’re really strong,” Marguerite says.

            “Hot stuff,” Eddie says, making a muscle.

            At the end of the night, they stand on the boardwalk in a fashion they have seen in the movies, holding hands, leaning against the railing. Out on the sand, an old ragpicker has built a small fire from sticks and torn towels and is huddling by it, settled in for the night.

            “You don’t have to ask me to wait,” Marguerite says suddenly.

            Eddie swallows.

            “I don’t?”

            She shakes her head. Eddie smiles. Saved from a question that has caught in his throat all night, he feels as if a string has just shot from his heart and looped around her shoulders, pulling her close, making her his. He loves her more in this moment than he thought he could ever love anyone.

            A drop of rain hits Eddie’s forehead. Then another. He looks up at the gathering clouds.

“Hey, Hot Stuff?” Marguerite says. She smiles but then her face droops and she blinks back water, although Eddie cannot tell if it is raindrops or tears.

“Don’t get killed, OK?” she says.

——Time is not what we think. Dying? Not the end of everything. We think it is. But what happens on earth is only the beginning.”

——Sacrifice is a part of life. It’s supposed to be. It’s not something to regret. It’s something to aspire to. Little sacrifices. Big sacrifices. A mother works so her son can go to school. A daughter moves home to take care of her sick father.

—–Sometimes when you sacrifice something precious, you’re not really losing it. You’re just passing it on to someone else.

——All parents damage their children. It cannot be helped. Youth, like pristine glass, absorbs the prints of its handlers. Some parents smudge, others crack, a few shatter childhoods completely into jagged little pieces, beyond repair.

——Parents rarely let go of their children, so children let go of them. They move on. They move away. The moments that used to define them – a mother’s approval, a father’s nod – are covered by moments of their own accomplishments. It is not until much later, as the skin sags and the heart weakens, that children understand; their stories, and all their accomplishments, sit atop the stories of their mothers and fathers, stones upon stones, beneath the waters of their lives.

——-Silence was an escape, but silence is rarely a refuge.

——Holding anger is a poison. It eats you from inside. We think that hating is a weapon that attacks the person who harmed us. But hatred is a curved blade. And the harm we do, we do to ourselves.

——No one is born with anger. And when we die, the soul is freed of it. But now, here, in order to move on, you must understand why you felt what you did, and why you no longer need to feel it.

—–People say they “find” love, as if it were an object hidden by a rock. But love takes many forms, and it is never the same for any man and woman. What people find then is a certain love. We found a certain love, a grateful love, a deep but quiet love, one that we knew, above all else, was irreplaceable.

—–Love, like rain, can nourish from above, drenching couples with a soaking joy. But sometimes, under the angry heat of life, love dries on the surface and must nourish from below, tending to its roots, keeping itself alive.

——Lost love is still love. It takes a different form, that’s all. You can’t see their smile or bring them food or tousle their hair or move them around a dance floor. But when those senses awaken, another heightens. Memory. Memory becomes your partner. You nurture it. You hold it. You dance with it. Life has to end… love doesn’t.

hear it…

April 11th, 2007 by vj-stephanie

ECHOES OF OUR HEARTS

 

Sometimes we
close our eyes and just listen to the echoes of our hearts. We all fall in love
and there are times when we love so much that we lose ourselves in our own
emotions. More often than not, we wonder why there are love that grows cold. We
would start to search for answers and try to find where love has gone wrong.
But in the end we find ourselves where we started for we cannot question love
when it has its own reasons. Love will always be as it always has
been…silent, mysterious, deeply profound.

Many of us believe that love is forever, that
love never dies only to be disillusioned in the end when we find our hands
empty and our hearts longing. We have mistakenly have looked at love as a need
to be fulfilled. But love is only a gift given to us. We should not only hold
it in our hands for we may never find the strength to let it go when it decides
to leave. We should only embrace its warmth and glow while it last and then
freely open our arms when its time to say “goodbye”. When we fall in love with
someone, we don’t want that feeling to end for it is everything we
are…everything that we wanted to be. We pray that love will grow and stay in
our hearts. But if it doesn’t, then we should never let our lives be taken by
it, for life should not where heartaches begin.

There is always a reason why we have to move
on. When we have to say goodbye to the feelings we wanted to stay forever. Lets
us not wave our hands with a heavy heart. For love will have to set its wings
free and find the place where it belongs. We may have lost it but then again,
when we close our eyes and listen to the echoes of our hearts we will hear the
feeling resounding silently forever.

Then we’ll know it has never left u for the
good that we have become because of love will always stay. It will always be
there reminding us that we should be thankful and happy, not because we have
lost love but because for once in our lives, that feeling lived in our hearts
and made us happy.

 

…one of my favorites…

April 11th, 2007 by vj-stephanie

…the ALCHEMIST,..

 

—If a person is living out his Personal Legend, he knows
everything he needs to know. There is only one thing that makes a dream
impossible to achieve: the FEAR OF FAILURE.

 

–At the moment, it seemed to him that time stood still, and
the Soul of the World surged within him. When he looked into her dark eyes, and
saw that her lips were poised between a laugh and silence, he learned the most
important part of the language that all the world spoke – the language that
everyone on earth was capable of understanding in their heart. It was love.
Something older than humanity, more ancient than the desert. Something that
exerted the same force whenever two pairs of eyes met, as had theirs here at
the well. She smiled, and that was certainly an omen – the omen he had been
awaiting, without even knowing he was, for all his life,. The omen he had
sought to find with his sheep and in his books, in crystals and in silence of
the desert.

It was the
pure Language of the World. It required no explanation, just as the universe
needs none as it travels through endless time. What the boy felt at that moment
was that he was in the presence of the only woman in his life, and that, with
no need for words, she recognized the same thing. He was more certain of it
than of anything in the world. He had been told by his parents and grandparents
that he must fall in love and really know a person before becoming
committed.but maybe people who felt that way had never learned the universal
language. Because, when you know that language, it’s easy to understand that
someone in the world awaits you, whether it’s in the middle of the desert or in
some great city. And when two such people encounter each other, and their eyes
meet, the past and the future become unimportant. There is only that moment,
and the incredible certainty that everything under the sun has been written by
one hand only. It is the hand that evokes love, and creates a twin soul for
every person in the world. Without such love, one’s dream would have no meaning.

 

—–Love never keeps a man from pursuing his Personal
Legend. If he abandons that pursuit, it’s because it wasn’t true love…the love
that speaks the Language of the World.

 

—- one is loved because one is loved. No reason is needed
for loving.

 

—-The wise men understood that this natural world is only
an image and a copy of paradise. The existence of this world is simply a
guarantee that there exists a world that is perfect. God created the world so
that through its visible objects, men could understand his spiritual teachings
and the marvels of his wisdom.

 

—the boy listen to his heart…

“eventhough
I complain sometimes, it’s because I’m the heart of a person and people’s heart
are that way. People are afraid to pursue their most important  dreams, because they feel that they don’t
deserve them, or that they’ll be unable to achieve them. We, their hearts,
become fearful just thinking of loved ones who go away forever, or of moments
that could have been good but weren’t, or of treasures that might have been
found but were forever hidden in the sands. Because when these things happen,
we suffer terribly.”

 

—-fear of suffering is worse than the suffering itself.
And no heart has ever suffered when it goes in search of its dreams, because
every second of the search is a second’s encounter with God and with eternity.

 

—Everyone on earth has a treasure that awaits him. We,
people’s hearts, seldom say much about those treasures, because people no
longer want to go in search of them. We speak of them only to children. Later,
we simply let life proceed, in its own direction, towards its own fate. But,
unfortunately, very few follow the path laid out for them – the path to their
Personal Legends, and to happiness. Most people see the world as threatening
place, and, because they do, the world turns out, indeed, to be a threatening
place.

 

Ein Lebes/Hasesbrief fur Jetaime…

March 21st, 2007 by vj-stephanie

Manila

. 10.19.88

Lieber Jetaime,

Wie gehts? Bist du glucklich mit Wena? Seht ihr euch oft? Ich vermisse dich! Ich brauche dich so sehr. Aber du liebst jemand anders. Du vergisst

mich

. Du vergisst unsere Liebe fur uns.

Ich muss mein Leben, leben. Ich muss dich vergessen. Ich liebe dich. Du liebst

mich

nicht. Tschus jetaime! Viel gluck! Du machst Wena glucklich, bitte.

Herzliche Grusse von Ellaine

getting to know me..

March 21st, 2007 by vj-stephanie

Well, im Stephanie… most of my friends call me that or in short, they call me.. “steph”. Some stef with f, while some of my classmates here in UPD call me “steffi” o kaya by the surname… pero dun sa’men, there are some hu call me “phanie”… hehehe… nice diba?,. halos chinap-chop na yung name ko. Well, it doesn’t matter naman…basta as long as ok tawag sa’ken. I wonder nga why wala tumatawag saken using my second name…sayang naman yun if di magagamit,. Hehehe..

Anyway, I love to read books. Actually, medyo nagstart lang yan before I enter college. I prefer kasi nun ung mga magazines like candy, ym, chalk and meg. I learn there new stuff and look for styles. Well, for now, I am hooked on pocketbooks. I like Paulo Coelho. Hai… sino ba naman di magugustuhan mga books nya diba?. Life lessons! Nakakaenjoy basahin. Gusto ko yung The Alchemist nya, pati na rin yung Veronica Decides to Die, at yung iba pa nyang novels. Speaking of that kind of author, syempre si Dan Brown kasama dyan. His Angels and Demons, pati na rin yung Da Vinci’s Code… ganda rin! It’s amazing kasi; nice yung sequence of events…it’s like you’ll never know what will happen next kaya magpupuyat just to finish it agad. Aside from them, I like din Tuesday with Morrie pati Five People You Meet In Heaven. It’s such an inspiring book. I recommend it to everyone… hai… ma-eenjoy nio. It’s not boring. If you guys, don’t want it, try nio Bob Ong books. Hehehe… kalokohan ba?,. why not? Try it… masaya yun… hehehe.. kaya naman yung The Little Prince. I think teenager must also check it out.

I somehow know German language… syempre noh,. Sayang naman foreign language ko di ba?!.. nag-enjoy ako jan. ok kasi prof ko..tapos my german movies pa like Goodbye Lenin..hehehe.. Ich bin glucklich. Ich spreche Deutsch. Hehehe…

How about my favorites?…

…I love tazmania… lalo na if baby_taz!  Hai.. cute nia talaga! Mas cute yun kay spongebob; kay snoopy; kay hello kitty; at kung kani-kanino pa. Hehehe.. (mang-away ba?. Ah basta. Cia pinakacute saken. Kanya-kanya yan!)

…blue, violet and green are the colors I like. Ewan ko ba…basta yun gusto ko. I tink no need for further explanation. Hehehe…

…I’m such a MUSIC LOVER… whatever I do, I like

sana

na nagsosoundtrip, wats the use of I-pod diba..kung pede nga pati pagboring yung class e. Hehehe… (im not that vain noh!) anyway, I love acoustics. Uhmm.. o kaya yung medyo medley o kaya naman yung masasayang songs. Ah basta I want those songs with sincerity…yung may touch of enchanting melody. Kelangan maganda yung meaning of the song accompanied with the right tone para mas masarap pakinggan. I’m not specific to any artist naman… as long as they can sing it nicely. Ok na yun…I love to listen din yung mga inspirational songs like yung mga hymns sa church. Hai..nice to reflect for those kind of music.

wat else?…

uhmm. I hate those foolish stupid people. Yoko nung mga nagsasabi ng bad words… bad kaya yun. Hehehe… lalo na if they say it to those people around them. Hello?! Konting respect naman. Yoko rin dun sa mga taong feeler..hai,. guys, just be yourself. It’s the best thing that we all can do. Pati na rin sa mga boastful rookies…wala lang;

sana

lang diba may ipagyayabang sila. And I do really hate those people na nang-iiwan; those vain rational beings who will leave you alone; empty and deserted. Just like those who just play and being irresponsible in their lives. Hai… wala lang..

and since this site naman is mine,.. siguro naman I’m free to express myself. Hehehe…

well, that’s a part of being me. Those things are not enough to describe the real me… syempre mas ok pa rin if may konting mystery diba?.. hehehe….

aesthetics of music

March 21st, 2007 by vj-stephanie

Music is definitely a form of art. I do believe that just like paintings, songs are masterpieces of the artist. They are forms of expressions. The topics and thoughts shared by Jenefer Robinson and those other “music analyst” have important points to ponder. They obviously emphasize how music influences people.

Well, I can tell that an individual’s perception affects a lot. The way we perceive music is different from other listeners. We have different outlooks and concepts, so we have our own insights towards these matters. Sometimes a certain song is nice for us but others don’t want it. For example, the song Boom Tarat Tarat by Willie Revillame, some likes it especially the kids but for others, it’s so irritating and baduy. I think perceiving music is basically based on how the music itself appeals to us.

Another thing is the fact that we are moved by music differently. There are circumstances wherein what we feel is unusual from what the song was trying to say. Our experiences and feelings are some of the reasons. It seems that what we feel is connected to the song. And we can’t deny that music arouses our feelings. It’s like it reminds us something; either from previous events or anything from the past. It might be because we can relate ourselves on the story behind the song. Let’s take some examples. For those happy people or in love, a song entitled Now that You are Here by Christian Bautista is appropriate for them:

Now that you are here

Flowing with love and care

Imagine all the years that we will spend together

I can’t wait to start my life with you

Many sunsets have passed

Each one lonely never love you

But you came here today

You shed light to my dark days.

And for those who are not so happy, the song Someday by Nina might be an exact theme song. I’ve read in a magazine that many like it mainly because of its message which says:

“I know you don’t really see my worth
You think you’re the best guy on earth
Well I’ve got news for you
I know I’m not that strong
But it won’t take long
Won’t take long

Someday someone’s gonna love me
The way I wanted you to need me
Someday someone’s gonna take your place
One day I’ll forget about you
Someday someday…”

At the given songs above, we can feel the happiness or pain. In Peter Kivy’s account, I agreed on how he emphasizes lyrics. I also believe that texts or lyrics help a lot. I mean there are songs that seem to be so nice because its messages are meaningful. Lyrics play an important role just like rhythm and melody.

Anyway, we’ll notice that in every advertisement, there’s corresponding song attached to it. It can actually be considered as a form of public exposure. And the instrument they used here are songs. We can’t deny that, as a viewer, it really helps. Once we hear a song used in an ad, we immediately recognize and remember the product. One good example is the song “All Out of Love” by Dennis Trillo. Whenever we hear it, we remember him in his TV commercial (napkin). What I’m trying to show and point out here is how powerful music is.

Since I use the word “powerful”, I would like to elaborate further Plato’s aesthetics. He considers art as a powerful imitation, which can be dangerous. I had proven how art moves people; how it touches its listeners. In terms of music, it’s obviously by arousing our emotions. We feel sorry, sad, happy, disappointed, excited and others. Actually, I can even say that there’s corresponding song or music for every emotions we have. There’s a perfect song that can relate to our feelings. Kendall Walton uses the concept of imagination. It’s true that there are times that we imagine things through those songs. We think that we are involved in it. We feel what the composer feels… which shows how emotions connect the song to the listeners.

But there’s one thing I don’t agree on Plato’s account. He’s right that there are dangerous art and I consider it as bad songs. But not all music are dangerous. There are other songs that don’t bring bad effects to people just like those songs that relax and soothe us once we hear it. The orchestras and those musical plays like Ms. Saigon amaze us and don’t bring any harm.

I think what Plato said is just a reminder. And the best thing we can do is to choose the right music and remember what Jenefer Robinson establishes in her study. The difference between cognition and emotion shows that they can be independent with one another. She’s right also to accentuate that the emotion of music is not basically the emotion that the listener should feels. Plato and Robinson’s philosophy are focusing on aesthetics. It’s just that they are looking at it in their different ways. I just noticed that in Jenefer Robinson’s account, she centered on “emotions” which is an aspect in our previous discussion of women’s philosophy.